Wager A Lot and Earn Little in Craps

[ English ]

If you choose to use this system you really want to have a very big amount of money and amazing discipline to go away when you generate a small success. For the purposes of this essay, a sample buy in of $2,000 is used.

The Horn Bet numbers are surely not looked at as the "successful way to compete" and the horn bet itself has a casino edge well over twelve percent.

All you are wagering is five dollars on the pass line and a single number from the horn. It doesn’t matter whether it is a "craps" or "yo" as long as you bet it routinely. The Yo is more dominant with gamblers using this scheme for obvious reasons.

Buy in for two thousand dollars when you approach the table but only put $5.00 on the passline and one dollar on one of the 2, 3, eleven, or twelve. If it wins, great, if it loses press to $2. If it loses again, press to $4 and then to $8, then to sixteen dollars and following that add a $1.00 each subsequent wager. Every time you do not win, bet the previous amount plus one more dollar.

Using this scheme, if for example after 15 rolls, the number you bet on (11) hasn’t been thrown, you probably should walk away. Although, this is what might develop.

On the 10th roll, you have a sum total of $126 in the game and the YO finally hits, you come away with three hundred and fifteen dollars with a gain of one hundred and eighty nine dollars. Now is a perfect time to march away as it is higher than what you joined the table with.

If the YO doesn’t hit until the 20th roll, you will have a total wager of $391 and because your current action is at $31, you earn $465 with your take of $74.

As you can see, using this scheme with only a one dollar "press," your profit margin becomes smaller the more you bet on without hitting. That is why you must walk away once you have won or you have to wager a "full press" once again and then advance on with the $1.00 mark up with each hand.

Crunch some numbers at home before you attempt this so you are very adept at when this scheme becomes a losing proposition rather than a winning one.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.